The ‘Académie royale’ (Royal Academy), founded in 1648, brought together the finest artists of its time. It diffused its theories, defining classical art, through treatises. It soon came to hold a monopoly on art education. Its members gave life-drawing classes and lectures. Students would then go on to improve their skills in the studio of one of their masters. It regularly organised exhibitions, known as Salons, and competitions, the most famous of which was the ‘Prix de Rome’, allowing the award winners to spend four years there to discover, in particular, the works of the great Italian masters. One of the key academic principles was the submission of appearance to knowledge. Thus, students had to have a perfect knowledge of anatomy in order to correctly represent the human body. The composition takes into account the laws of perspective and lighting, giving volume and depth to the different elements. Finally, in-depth knowledge of history allows drawing parallels between tales from Greco-Roman mythology, biblical stories and contemporary events. The academicians refer very often to antiquity, where the works are regarded as examples of the ‘Beau idéal’ (Ideal excellence).
Painting is divided into a hierarchy of genres. Painting of history is regarded as the most noble. Supposed to require greater intellectual effort, it includes religious, mythological and battle paintings. The second genre is the portrait. Then comes the genre painting, depicting scenes from everyday life, and the ‘observational’ genres: landscape, animal and still life painting, which are less esteemed. In the 19th century, history painting remained a highly appreciated genre. Its painters received numerous commissions from the state or from institutions. However, the hierarchisation of genres was shaken and eventually disappeared thanks to the Impressionist artists, who elevated landscape painting to a position of prestige. Artists’ societies and other Salons emerged, demonstrating the vitality of greater creative freedom and independent of institutions.

Alexandre Denis ABEL DE PUJOL (Valenciennes, 1785 – Paris, 1861)
Circa 1819
Oil on canvas
51.7 x 62.9 inches
This work was commissioned by Louis XVIII and exhibited at the Salon of 1819. It is one of a series of four decorated lintel paintings with a mythological theme. One of these paintings has disappeared, the others are in the Louvre and in the ‘Musée des Augustins’ (Augustin’s Museum) in Toulouse.
The composition is closely focused on Sisyphus, represented from behind. His powerful musculature, enhanced by his nudity, evokes the vigour of a king in the prime of life, even if he no longer has the attributes of power.
Sisyphus is trying to hold back the heavy stone he has just dropped. He raises his left hand in a gesture of surprise or to protect himself from the person facing him. It is Medusa. With bloodshot eyes, she seems to be pushing the rock down the slope.
Sisyphus is the mythical founder of Corinth, known for his ordeal in the underworld. For defying the gods and death, he was condemned to roll an immense boulder to the top of a mountain, which, each time it reached the top toppled over and rolled back down eternally.
The special feature of this representation is the presence of the Gorgon. This monstrous creature with snakes in place of hair, who is not a part of the myth of Sisyphus, is perhaps the real subject of the painting.
Transfer of ownership by the State in 2006
Restored in 2020 with the help of the ‘Fonds Régional d’Aide à la Restauration’ (Regional Restoration Aid Fund).

Charles MELLIN (Nancy, 1597 – Rome, 1649)
Rome, 1627
Oil on canvas
34.8 x 52.7 inches
For a long time, this work was attributed to Simon Vouet, a contemporary of Mellin. This confusion can be explained by the similarity of style between the painters, who met frequently during their stay in Rome. Many of Mellin’s works have also been attributed to other artists, notably Nicolas Poussin.
There is no evidence to support a formal identification of the figure. However, this representation is very close to those traditionally associated with Danaë.
In Greek mythology, Danaë was the only daughter of Acrisius, King of Argos. When an oracle told him that he would die at the hands of his grandson, he locked Danaë in a tower of bronze. Zeus then joins forces with her in the form of a shower of gold, giving birth to Perseus.
Mellin takes up again the representation codes of this scene. The close-up, accentuated by the bed framed by a red velvet curtain, focuses attention on the young woman lying completely naked. Her closed eyes suggest rest, but her body is twisted twice. Her feet, sex and breasts are soberly concealed, whilst the light, a reminder of Zeus, illuminates and highlights the shape of her belly.
This painting exudes a certain eroticism.
Bequest from F. Suisse, 1902

Henri-Joseph de FORESTIER (Puerto Hincado, Saint-Domingue, 1787 – Paris, 1872)
Paris, 1813
Oil on canvas
45 x 58.6 inches
In 1809 de Forestier left the island of Santo Domingo and moved to Paris to study painting. A student at the ‘École des Beaux-Arts’ (School of Fine arts), he won the first ‘Prix de Rome (Prize of Rome) with this work.
In the Bible, God promises Abraham descendants as numerous as the stars in the sky. It was through his grandson Jacob, the father of 12 sons, that this promise was fulfilled. At the time of his death, at the age of 147, he blessed them with a final prophecy announcing the 12 tribes of Israel. The eleventh son, Joseph, plays an important role in Jewish tradition because his life is the prelude to the story of the Hebrews in Egypt. His bereavement, at his father’s death, is long and substantial, as shown by the lamentations of his sons in this work.
Jacob, marked by old age, has just breathed his last breath. His eyes are closed, his face peaceful. The colourful sheets on his deathbed indicate a certain prosperity.
One of the sons leans over his body. The richness of his attire suggests that he is Joseph, Governor of Egypt. His face is illuminated by the same light that bathes Jacob and, despite the sadness, seems more serene than those of his brothers. He makes a final gesture of farewell, filled with affection. Among the 9 sons present, we can distinguish Reuben, the eldest, who is visibly older, and Benjamin, the youngest, who is still a child.
On loan from the ‘École des Beaux-Arts de Paris’ (School for Fine Arts of Paris)

ANONYMOUS
Italy, 1st half of the 19th century
Oil on canvas
48 x 67.5 inches
Joseph lies on his bed. Christ gives him his last words and holds his hand in a gesture of tenderness. Mary shows her sadness. The proximity of death is indicated by the dark background. Leaning against the mattress, a cherub seems to be praying. None of the figures pay him any attention, as if he were not physically there.
Christian tradition places this episode before the public life of Jesus, which would explain the silence of the evangelical texts on the subject. Artists were, therefore, quite free in their interpretations. As here, Joseph is usually depicted as grey-haired. The Holy Family, reunited for the last time, is often accompanied by an angel, signifying that God is at their side in this ordeal.
In the 1980s, this painting was in the sacristy of the museum’s chapel. However, we do not yet know when or how it was acquired.
Restored in 2020 with the help of the ‘Fonds Régional d’Aide à la Restauration’ (Regional Restoration Aid Fund).

Anonymous
Southern Germany, circa 1500
Carved, painted and gilded wood
34 x 26.3 x 1.5 inches
This object, entirely painted, with many gilded elements, is perhaps part of an altarpiece. Its provenance is difficult to determine, but its craftsmanship suggests southern Germany, where similar works have been found.
The artist has captured the movement of the angel Gabriel as he enters Mary’s room. The wood is hollowed out to indicate an open window. Gabriel holds out two fingers as a sign of words. He announces to Mary that she is going to bear the Son of God. The young woman is praying. Her head tilted to one side and her eyes closed, she accepts the divine decision.
In the foreground, a chalice on the floor symbolises the future sacrifice of her son.
On loan from the ‘Musée Départemental Rignault’ (Lot Department Rignault Museum), 2022

Nicolaas DAEMS (around 1600)
Mechelen, between 1611 and 1632
Alabaster and gilding, carved and gilded wooden frame
13.5 x 12.2 x 1.3 inches
The gilded cartouche shows the initials of the little-known artist. This type of signature appears on many works of the same kind from the early 17th century.
Devotional reliefs were common from the late 16th to the 1st half of the 17th centuries. These scenes, dedicated to personal worship, usually depicted the Nativity, the Last Supper or the Adoration of the Wise Men or the Shepherds.
This playlet brings together the Nativity and the Adoration of the Shepherds, which, according to the New Testament, took place on the same night. They are evoked by the stable and the ox on the one hand and a camel and shepherds on the other. Mary, Joseph and the infant Jesus form the Holy Family. The use of a noble material, alabaster, indicates a wealthy patron.
On loan from the ‘Musée Départemental Rignault’ (Lot Department Rignault Museum), 2022

Joachim PATINIR (Dinant or Bouvignes, around 1480 – Anvers, 1524)
Flanders, 16th century
Oil on canvas
7.2 x 9.4 inches
Joachim Patinir is considered to be the first Flemish landscape painter and one of the most talented in his field. A Renaissance artist, he made landscapes the essential element of his work at a time when explorers such as Magellan were passionate about discovering distant lands.
Patinir liked to depict mythological or biblical scenes in imaginary and marvellous landscapes.
We are on the shores of a mountain lake, lined with rocks and trees with gnarled trunks. The foliage takes the shape of the clouds in the sky. Two boats stand out against the blue water. In the foreground, a peasant advances sitting astride an ox. On the right, in the background, we can distinguish a town made up of houses and towers. The distant mountains close the horizon.
This work brings to mind another painting by Joachim Patinir: Crossing the Styx, painted in 1520-1524, conserved now in the Prado Museum in Madrid.
In Greek mythology, the Styx is the river that separates the terrestrial world from the Underworld. Charon, the ferryman, was responsible for ferrying the souls of the dead from one bank to the other. The souls had to pay for the crossing with a coin or an object.
This work invites us to reflect on the passage of time, the earthly journey and the spiritual path. A calm harmony emanates from this landscape, as if it were eternal and unchanging.
Donation: Gauzin
Restored in 2020 with the help of the ‘Fonds Régional d’Aide à la Restauration’ (Regional Restoration Aid Fund).

1 – Anonymous
Virgin and Child
France, late 15th century
Carved and painted limestone
11 x 4.3 inches
Traces of polychrome, i.e., paint, are visible but may be later than the sculpture. It appears to have been restored at an undetermined time. However, this reminds us that in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance period, a great majority of religious sculptures were painted, as were church interiors.
On loan from the ‘Musée Départemental Rignault’ (Lot Department Rignault Museum), 2022.
2- Anonymous
Virgin and Child
Late 14th century, early 15th century
Carved and painted wood
44.4 x 14.5 inches
This sculpture shows traces of polychrome. In her hand, the Virgin holds a piece of fruit, that she presents to her son. In Western tradition, this is a recurring symbol, of Christ’s Passion announcing what is to come.
On loan from the ‘Musée Départemental Rignault’ (Lot Department Rignault Museum), 2022.
3- Anonymous
Virgin and Child
France, 15th century
Carved limestone
15.7 x 11.8 inches
On loan from the ‘Musée Départemental Rignault’ (Lot Department Rignault Museum), 2022
4- Anonymous
Virgin and Child
Late 14th century, early 15th century
Carved and painted wood
44.4 x 14.5 inches
This sculpture shows traces of polychrome. In her hand, the Virgin holds a piece of fruit, that she presents to her son. In Western tradition, this is a recurring symbol, of Christ’s Passion announcing what is to come.
On loan from the ‘Musée Départemental Rignault’ (Lot Department Rignault Museum), 2022.

Johann-Andreas-Joseph FRANCKE (Dresden, 1756 – Dresden, 1804)
Germany, late 18th century – early 19th century
Oil on canvas
70,8 x 77,1 inches
In an imaginary landscape, Daphnis tenderly holds Chloe in his arms, who is practising the art of the flute. Sitting on a rock in the shade of a tree, they are practically naked. The yellow cloak they share envelops them and isolates them from the rest of the scene. This is a common representation of the couple.
This story, based on an ancient Greek novel, takes place in the countryside of the island of Lesbos. Daphnis is a young goatherd and Chloe a shepherdess, as shown by the herd of sheep and goats in the background. These foundlings, brought up by peasants, gradually fall in love with each other. The novel recounts their sentimental education and their apprenticeship to love, in the face of numerous obstacles.
This work appeared in the museum’s inventories in the 1980s. To date, we do not know exactly when or how it entered the collections.
Restored in 2020 with the help of the ‘Fonds Régional d’Aide à la Restauration’ (Regional Restoration Aid Fund).

Charles SUISSE (Paris, 1813 – 1871)
Copy from a Narcisse DIAZ DE LA PENA (Bordeaux, 1807 – Menton, 1876)
The Love
2nd half of the 19th century
Oil on canvas
11.8 x 7 inches
A young woman is looking at a winged child: Cupid, the god of love. A handwritten label on the back of the painting informs us that he ‘insists on insinuating himself into the heart of a young girl who seems a little indifferent’. Will he be successful? It is interesting to note that the original work by Diaz de la Pena is entitled ‘Nymphe réprimandant l’Amour’ (Nymph Reprimanding Love).
Bequest from F. Suisse, 1902

ROHAUT (? – ?)
1851
Oil on wood
9.4 x 12.5 inches
Mary Magdalene is alone, sitting in a grotto. The white pages of an open book stand out against the dark background. The light is focused on Mary Magdalene, emphasising her milky complexion. A biblical figure of penitence, this former prostitute became a disciple of Jesus. According to Provençal legend, after the Resurrection, she embarked on the Mediterranean and landed in France, at Sainte-Marie-de-la-Mer. She evangelised the region before retiring to a cave in the Saint-Baume massif. The penitent Mary Magdalene is often depicted naked, with her hair down to signify her repentance. The book symbolises the divine Word. The fact that it is the one and only object at her side indicates that it is the only means of salvation.
Bequest from F. Suisse, 1902
Restored in 2020 with the help of the ‘Fonds Régional d’Aide à la Restauration’ (Regional Restoration Aid Fund).

Philippe Auguste JEANRON (Boulogne-sur-Mer, 1809 – Château de Comborn, Corrèze, 1877)
1846
Oil on wood panel
7,9 x 5,3 inches
As director general of the ‘Musées nationaux’ (National Museums), Jeanron gave the Louvre a modern administration. He had its galleries restored, saved a number of endangered masterpieces, and repatriated works that had been dispersed during the monarchy to various royal residences and churches. A self-taught painter and good draughtsman, few of his works are known. He painted a few landscapes and still lifes, but mainly devoted himself to realistic and allegorical portraits.
In a green setting cut off from the world, a naked young woman is surrounded by 3 sweethearts. These chubby children are mythological figures close to the representation of Cupid.
*Lutiner: to annoy, to tease mischievously; to provoke (a woman) by gallant teasing.
Bequest from F. Suisse, 1902

Guillaume GUILLON-LETHIÈRE (Saint-Anne de la Guadeloupe, 1760 – Paris, 1832)
Circa 1784
Oil on canvas
15.11 x 18.1 inches
A label on the back of the painting indicates that it was produced for the ‘Prix de Rome’, which the painter ‘who became very good at his art’ won. In reality, Guillon-Lethière won second prize in 1784. Two years later, there was no winner of the prestigious competition, and the jury decided to send the young man to Rome to reward his artistic qualities.
This work illustrates the myth of Daphne. Pursued by the god Apollo, the nymph refuses his advances. She flees but cannot escape him. In despair, she calls for help from her father, the river god Peneus. He turns her into a laurel tree. Apollo, far from being discouraged, made the laurel his tree and crowned himself with a wreath of its leaves. He then dedicated the laurel to triumphs, songs and poems.
The scene is set in a bucolic landscape. Daphne is beginning her transformation: her arms, stretched towards the sky, are already young branches. Her face, turned towards the ground, seems to express regret and sadness. The figure at her feet could possibly be her father, Peneus.
Apollo’s outstretched arms show both his desire to catch the nymph and to stop her metamorphosis.
Bequest from F. Suisse, 1902
Restored in 2020 with the help of the ‘Fonds Régional d’Aide à la Restauration’ (Regional Restoration Aid Fund).

Adolphe BRUNE (Paris, 1802 – 1880)
Circa 1840
Oil on canvas
64 x 45.2 inches
A painter of religious subjects, portraits, still lifes and mural compositions, Brune entered the ‘Ecole des Beaux-Arts’ (School of Fine Arts) in Paris in 1824. He exhibited widely at the Paris Salon, winning medals in 1834, 1838 and 1848. In 1870, he presented his Original Sin. Of his paintings, were in the session room of the Senate (1861), the ceiling of the new Louvre library (1861), the painting of the Sainte Catherine chapel in the Saint-Roch Church in Paris and, in the Versailles galleries, the portraits of King Louis XII, King Charles IX, Admiral Claude d’Annebaut, Paul de la Barthe, Maréchal de Thermes and Maréchal Ney.
Who is Joseph?
Born in Saint-Domingue around 1793, Joseph is one of the most famous models of the 19th century. We know that he arrived in Marseille before moving to Paris. In 1808, he was hired as an actor by Madame Saqui, the director of a famous theatre company. The painter Théodore Géricault (1791-1824) had him pose for The Raft of the Medusa: seen from behind, dominating over the other shipwrecked men, he waves a piece of cloth in the direction of a distant ship. In 1832, Joseph became a model at the ‘École des Beaux-Arts’ in Paris, posing for Théodore Chassériau (1819-1856). He made a very modest living, frequenting artists’ studios. He probably died in the late 1860s or early 1870s.
The black model or giving a name to a face
For several years now, under the influence of American universities, researchers have been examining aesthetic, political, social and racial issues and the imaginary world revealed by the representation of black figures from the 1st abolition of slavery in France (1794) to the present day. The exhibition Black Models, from Géricault to Matisse (2018) presents this research. It looks at the dialogue between the artist and the model, who is both the subject being looked at and the bearer of values. Questioning the anonymity of the model and black identity, it was an opportunity to give a name to models who left their mark on the art of the 19th and 20th centuries.
The title of the work
In 1865, Adolphe Brune presented, at the Salon, Joseph, the Negro, the original title. Smiling and holding a cup to his lips, he is at the centre of the composition. The contents of the basket and the fabric add an exotic touch. The title refers to the model and raises questions: is it a tribute by the painter to this man, described by his contemporaries as handsome, strong, friendly, charming and jovial, or a pretext for displaying his savoir-faire? Here we find the stereotypes of black bonhomie. Yet this work is not just a representation of a middle-aged black man. Brune has created a highly expressive portrait in which Joseph is not simply his model, he is his subject. The title of the work is the legacy of a history that we cannot erase. The term ‘negro’ reflects dated racial markers that say nothing about the model’s identity. Outrageous and offensive, it is intolerable.
By keeping it, we refuse to mislead our visitors, we refuse to forget that, for centuries, the norm was racist. We all have the responsibility to remember this painful memory and not pretend that it never happened.
It is by facing up to this ‘past that doesn’t go away’ that we can, today, first and foremost, look at Joseph as a man in all his dignity.

ANONYMOUS
1846
Oil on paper pasted onto cardboard
9.4 x 11.4 inches
This work by an unknown artist is reminiscent of the style of Paul Huet, as indicated by a handwritten label on the back. The scene depicts a landscape of undergrowth with a winding stream. A twisted branch, reaching for the sky, occupies the centre of the composition. It is difficult for the light to penetrate the foliage, and gives light golden touches. In the background, the abundance of greenery creates a wall of vegetation. This work is thought to have been painted in Italy, in Parpigno, a small picturesque village in central Italy’s Umbria region. Jean-Baptiste Corot also made several studies here in 1826 during his stay in Italy.
Bequest from F. Suisse, 1902
Restored in 2020 with the help of the ‘Fonds Régional d’Aide à la Restauration’ (Regional Restoration Aid Fund).

Gustave COURBET (Ornans, 1819 – La-Tour-de-Peilz, 1877)
Fontainebleau, circa 1850
Oil on canvas
6.8 x 11.3 inches
Courbet took part in the enhancement of the forest of Fontainebleau. Under the July Monarchy, the forest was equipped and footpaths were signposted, along with illustrated guidebooks. It was an easy access, by train, for the Parisians. For some artists, the tranquillity and wildness of the area were sacrificed. However, an ‘artistic reserve’ was created and the forest was managed with the aesthetics and quality of the landscape in mind. The landscape depicted here consists of two hills of a light colour and a forest of a particular dark green. A few houses stand out among the trees.
Bequest F. Suisse, 1902

Gustave COURBET (Ornans, 1819 – La-Tour-de-Peilz, 1877)
Circa 1850
Oil on canvas
6.7 x 11.1 inches
The scene depicts a hill covered with poppies bending in the wind, surrounded by summer-yellowed grass. In the background, a green field stretches to the horizon. The heavy grey sky heralds’ rain. Courbet loved to visit unknown places, unknown retreats. It was this love of nature that he transcribed into his small paintings, where the dark tones can be explained by his technique. He coated his canvas with a background of bitumen, then applied touches of lighter paint. But bitumen darkens under the effect of light. These small paintings are therefore less legible than when they were created.
Bequest from F. Suisse, 1902

Gustave COURBET (Ornans, 1819 – La-Tour-de-Peilz, 1877)
Fontainebleau, circa 1850
Oil on card transferred to canvas
8.1 x 10.4 inches
Around 1848, Courbet, who had been a romantic until then, asserted his taste for reality, rejecting the idealism championed by the Academy. At the ‘Salons’, he exhibited landscapes with no human figures and political works. He caused a scandal, as with ‘Un enterrement à Ornans, 1850’ (A Burial at Ornans, 1850): for the first time, a scene from everyday life was depicted in large format, like a history painting. Courbet liked to paint places that he felt close to, that appealed to his sensibilities. In this study, a stream flows peacefully in spite of the rocks. The trees have dense foliage, and the sky is barely visible. Despite the indication on the back, it is possible that this is the ‘Puits Noir’ site. This place, near Ornans where Courbet lived, inspired him several times.
Bequest from F. Suisse, 1902

Anonymous / School of Verona (1528–1588)
Italy, second half of the 16th century
Oil on canvas
76.5 x 106 cm
In the Old Testament, Abraham wishes to marry off his son, Isaac. He sends his servant Eliezer on a mission. Upon reaching a well, Eliezer prays that the woman who offers him a drink may be the chosen one. This woman is Rebecca. After a long period of infertility, she will have two sons: Esau and Jacob.
This work is attributed to the School of Verona. Towards the end of his life, this Venetian Renaissance painter abandoned large-scale compositions. He then turned his attention, as seen here, to landscapes and scenes of rural life.
‘Rebecca at the Fountain’ appears to be the final variation on another painting depicting a meeting near a source of water: ‘Jacob et Rachel au puits’ (Jacob and Rachel at the Well). Indeed, the way the figures pose are similar. The well, a symbol of life and fertility, is featured in several biblical narratives.
Compared with earlier works, the rendering of the figures lacks a certain fluidity. It is highly probable that the painting was partly executed by the members of the Veronese’s workshop and not only by himself.
‘MNR’ (National Museum Recuperation), on loan from the State, attributed by the ‘Office des Biens et Intérêts Privés’ (Office for Personal Property and Interests), 1955
What?!
A looted artwork in a museum???
During the Second World War, thousands of works of art were looted from their Jewish owners by the German army.
Many were shipped to Germany. At the end of the war, they were repatriated and some were returned to their owners. The others, such as this one, were entrusted to the care of the national museums, which in turn placed them on loan to provincial museums.
Designated by the acronym MNR, standing for ‘Musées Nationaux Récupération’ (National Museums Recuperation), these works have a particular status.
They must be exhibited to facilitate their identification. Consequently, all information supports and materials must mention this status and the provenance, in other words, ‘attributed by the “Office des Biens et Intérêts Privés” (Office for Personal Property and Interests)’, in reference to the institution that managed these assets after the war. MNR works must not leave French territory.
This painting was repatriated from Baden-Baden in January 1948 to the headquarters of the ‘commission de récupération artistique’ (Art Recovery Commission). It was allocated to the Louvre Museum (Department of Paintings) by the Office for Personal Property and Interests in 1951, and subsequently loaned to the Cahors Museum in 1955.
Why is this work not restored?
Only the owner can decide whether an intervention should be carried out on a work of art. Neither the State nor the museums that hold MNR works can act on the behalf of the owner. They cannot, therefore, carry out restoration operations.
Any eventual operations carried out on the works – which is thoroughly documented – is, therefore, limited to conservation measures, the only valid justification being to prevent their deterioration. This rule also aims to safeguard against the loss of any inscription or clue that may lead to the identification of the owners and enable them to recover these items to which they are rightfully entitled.
We must, however, emphasise that, whilst not endangering the works themselves, the passage of time can significantly deteriorate their state of presentation. Reaching a point where some museums, consider them unreadable, relegate them to their storage facilities. Consequently, only a digitised image remains available online, bearing witness to the existence of these MNRs. It is, therefore, legitimate to question the meaning of history: the less these works are displayed to the public, the less likely they are to be recognised by their rightful owners. Nearly 80 years after the end of the Second World War, many of them have passed away and their beneficiaries sometimes have very little information concerning the property looted from their families.
This is where lies the importance and the interest of the Mission for the Research and Restitution of Cultural Property looted between 1933 and 1945. It is evident that it still has a great deal of work to do before its task is complete.
The Mission of Restitution
Legally speaking, MNR items do not form part of France’s public collections. The State is their temporary custodian. Listed in specific inventories, they await restitution, with no statute of limitations applying.
Since 1951, of the 2,200 unclaimed MNR items, only 169 have been returned. In 2018, the Mission for the Research and Restitution of Cultural Property looted between 1933 and 1945 was established.
This coordination, management, and research service reviews files on a case-by-case basis, either at the request of the families or on its own initiative.
The Mission orchestrates the actions to identify the works and their owners, understand their history, present them to the public and return them. The Rose-Valland website provides access to the MNR catalogue.
During the war, the Stern family’s townhouse in Paris was looted and occupied by the Kriegsmarine. In 1947, at Darmstadt, the allies searched the home of a dance teacher who had served in the German navy. They found 13 works of art.
Handed over to the French authorities, six were returned to the Stern family, but the connection to the other seven could not be established; among them was a painting by the Flemish artist Mathys Schoevaerdt, ‘Place avec église, obélisque et passants’ (Square with a Church, Obelisk and Passers-by) or ‘Kermesse’ (Festival). Like ‘Rebecca à la fontaine’ (Rebecca at the Fountain), it was placed on loan to Cahors in 1955.
In 2020, the seven works of art were returned to Marguerite Stern’s beneficiaries.

Charles SUISSE (Paris, 1813 – 1871) / After Gabriele SMARGIASSI (Vasto, 1798 – Naples, 1882)
France (?), 2nd half of the 19th century
Oil on canvas
15,9 x 11,4 inches
The attribution of this study to Smargiassi is uncertain. A handwritten label on the back of the painting states that the artist is Charles Suisse. Smargiassi was a member of the Posillipo school, named after a seaside hill in the Bay of Naples. Thanks to this group of artists, landscape painting, and urban views in particular, flourished. This small painting depicts a landscape of jagged rocks. The rock in the foreground forms an arch through which the sea can be seen. This is the ‘arco naturale’ (‘natural arch’) on the island of Capri.
Bequest from F. Suisse, 1902
Restored in 2020 with the help of the ‘Fonds Régional d’Aide à la Restauration’ (Regional Restoration Aid Fund).

Théodore GUDIN (Paris, 1802 – Boulogne-sur-Seine, 1880)
1837
Oil on canvas
13,8 x 22.1 inches
Expatriated to New York, Théodore Gudin joined the American navy before returning to France, where he turned to painting. A pupil of Anne-Louis Girodet, he painted almost exclusively seascapes and ships. His success led to him being named one of the very first painters of the Royal Navy.
Here, a two-masted ship is facing an approaching storm, announced by dark, oppressive clouds. In the distance, still under a blue sky, the sea appears calm, whilst in the foreground the waves are deepening and turning white as a result of the storm.
Storms and shipwrecks figure prominently in his work. He was particularly affected by the shipwreck that killed his brother and from which he himself escaped.
Bequest from F. Suisse, 1902
Restored in 2020 with the help of the ‘Fonds Régional d’Aide à la Restauration’ (Regional Restoration Aid Fund).

792 Rue Emile Zola – 46000 Cahors
Tél. 05 65 20 88 66 – www.musee-henri-martin.fr